I recently worked with an OEM who designed an injection molding machine for their customer. In their design, after the polypropylene parts are formed, they pass through a punch process which creates a scrap piece roughly 1-3/4″ in diameter and 6mm thick but it is very light in weight. The end user was looking for a way to recover these parts in an effort to reduce the amount of waste material in the process but needed an automated solution so they didn’t have to dedicate an operator to manually recover the parts and dump them in the recycle bin. The recovery bin is located close to 25 feet away on the other side of the machining area.
After further discussion, I recommended they incorporate our Model # 6085 2-1/2″ aluminum Line Vac into their design. The 2.5″ Line Vac has a 2.25″ inside throat diameter which could easily pass the parts and convey them to the collection hopper.
With the recovery bin being located outside of the processing area, they were going to have to run the discharge piping up and over the machines so they were needing something flexible to do so. In addition to the Line Vac, I suggested they use a 30′ section of our 2.5″ conveyance hose. Our conveyance hose is constructed of a durable, clear reinforced PVC, ideal for most general applications and we offer it in 10′ lengths up to 50′, in diameters of 3/8″ to 3″ ID.
When it comes to moving dry material, like small plastic parts or more abrasive materials like steel shot blasting media, the Line Vacs are the perfect, maintenance-free solution as they have no moving parts or motors to wear out. For help selecting the best option to fit your needs or to discuss how another product might be suitable for your application, give us a call.
A pharmaceutical company contacted EXAIR about static issues in their packaging area. When static is created, it can become a real nuisance. For this pharmaceutical company, it was greatly affecting the tablet filling station. They actually had four major areas generating static in their process. The first area was the preformed plastic trays at the start of their process. They would purchase many sheets of plastic from their supplier and as they started to unpack the sheets, a large amount of static would shock the operators. Another area was when the blister pack was being thermally formed. As for the tablets, they too were generating static when they were being separated from the forming process and transferred to the delivery chute. Like the same poles on a magnet, static charges with the similar polarity, will repel each other; causing the tablet to be rejected from the blister tray. The fourth area that had static was at the rotating brush. The brush was used to knock down any raised tablets inside the blister cavity. As the plastic bristles were rubbing against the tray and tablets, static was being generated. In order to keep this process running smoothly, they had to eliminate the static.
In evaluating the target areas to remove the static, I recommended the following solutions:
Unpacking of the preformed trays: As the operators started to unpack the plastic trays, they would get a big shock. Static is being generated as the sheet are moving and sliding across each other. I recommended the model 111224 Super Ion Air Knife Kit. The Super Ion Air Knife blows ionized air onto the surface. It can remove static and dust as far away as 20 feet. The operators could still perform their operation as the Super Ion Air Knife could perform its job. This will remove the static and also remove any plastic fragments or debris off the surface. Dirt and contamination is attracted to the material by static, and if the tray is not completely clean, the company has a potential to lose an allotment of product.
At the thermal forming machine: This machine uses a heated die to press cavities into a plastic film. As the tray is being made and pushed along, static is being created. I recommended the model 7012 Ionizing Bar. This would neutralize that static before the tablets are being inserted.
At the tablet chute: As the tablets are being moved and transferred, a static charge is being generated on the surface. When the tablets are about ready to be dispensed, the repulsion forces would cause either a delay by sticking to a prior tablet or a shift in alignment; both causing the tablet to miss the cavities of the blister pack. I recommended the 7012 Ionizing Bar to mount near the end of the chute. The Ionizing Bar creates both positive and negative ions to remove any type of static that passes underneath it.
The rotating brush: After the tablets are placed in the blister pack and before the foil is applied to enclose the package, a rotating brush with plastic bristles would rub on the surface of the plastic tray and the tablets. This would ensure that the tablets are lying flat in their cavities. This operation would regenerate the static. As you can see with the picture below, it was creating 1.5 Kilovolts of static electricity on the surface. I recommended another model 7012 Ionizing Bar to remove this buildup of static.
With any type of static issues, it is best to have a quantitative result of your process. The EXAIR model 7905 Static Meter can do this. This pharmaceutical company was able to determine how much static was being generated in their process, and how effective in removing the static. They were so happy with the results of the EXAIR Static Eliminators, they sent pictures to show. As you can see, we were able to remove all static before their last step of applying the foil. The rejection rate went way down and their process ran very smooth. If you start seeing issues with static in your process, you can contact EXAIR and speak to one of the Application Engineers. We have a large range of Static Eliminators that can help you.
Last week, I had the opportunity to work with a customer who was trying to cool a thermoformed film from 85° C (185° F) down to room temperature, 21° C (69.8° F) or low enough for the package to be handled by an operator. This container was 270 mm X 170 mm X 100 mm (10.63″ x 6.69″ x 3.94″)
In applications like this, the customer often calls in with the idea of using a Vortex Tube to produce the cold air. There are two reasons to use a different product than a vortex tube in this application. First, a vortex tube is only going to cool a small area, so to cool anything this size would take several vortex tubes. Second, the cold air is going to mix with the ambient air very quickly. When the ambient air mixes with the cold air from the vortex tube, the air will lose the cold temperature generated by the vortex tube. To counter act this mixing, we have had customers create an insulated container to hold cold air from a vortex tube close to a product, similar to a cooling tunnel. This works in some applications, but my customer had a continuously moving line. He did not have time to stop the line and install insulation around each product. He also didn’t have the length of conveyor needed to put a cooling tunnel over the line.
Instead of using the vortex tube, I suggested that he use a 12” (305 mm) Super Air Knife to cool the thermoformed container. The 12” Super Air Knife moves significantly more air than a vortex tube over the surface of the part. Thanks to the 40:1 amplification ration of the Super Air Knife, it creates more cooling to the product and use less compressed air than a series of Vortex Tubes. By mixing a large volume of free ambient air, that is the same temperature he needs to cool the part to, and a small amount of compressed air over the product they can easily cool their part to close to ambient so the operator can handle the part. The best benefit for this customer was they would not need change their manufacturing line. The air knife is the best choice when cooling a very hot, fairly flat, large surface part to a temperature close to ambient. If you need to cool a product to a temperature lower than room temperature, then a vortex tube would be a great product to do the job.