The Paint Line Engineering Manager for a major agricultural & industrial equipment manufacturer wanted to improve the efficiency of their paint lines. They had “halo” systems through which large parts passed for primer & paint coatings, which were equipped with inexpensive liquid-only spray nozzles:
You can get a whole handful of these and it’ll still cost you less than one of our Atomizing Spray Nozzles will. If you don’t have any particular concerns about efficiency, spray pattern adjustment, droplet size or flow control (and a lot of applications don’t require this, and that’s fine,) then these will work GREAT for you. And again, they’re abundant and cheap.
That wasn’t the case here – turns out, good quality paint is expensive, and every drop wasted adds up. Getting a fine, even coating on parts of different sizes & shapes, every time, requires precision control of the flow pattern. And design of an automated system benefits from a wide selection of options to choose from.
Enter the EXAIR line of Atomizing Spray Nozzles. With (90) models to choose from, we can cover (literally) darn near any spraying application you can come up with. If you know what flow rate and/or spray pattern you’re looking for (like a Paint Line Engineering Manager would,) then selection is quick & easy. Paint consumption is down, quality is up…and the reliability of the new system means they’re spending less time and resources on cleaning & maintenance. For the record, the halo system ended up looking like this:
If you’d like to find out more about how engineered products, like EXAIR’s Atomizing Spray Nozzles, can make a difference to your operations…and your bottom line…give me a call.
Visit us on the Web
Follow me on Twitter
Like us on Facebook
I was working with a customer the other day who had a control panel located in a very hot environment next to a steam turbine in a power plant. The panel already had a Cabinet Cooler System working to keep the internal space cooled. However, due to some faulty temperature data about the surrounding environment, the customer had underestimated the heat load required in the application. As a result, his control cabinet was running a little higher than he wanted it to in terms of temperature. His Target was 95°F but he was running a solid 105°F inside the cabinet.
After we discussed the application a bit further and he sent some photos of the Cabinet, I learned that there was a rather large, hot turbine, just inches away from this panel. I also determined that the customer had installed our Cabinet Cooler on the top of the panel and was feeding it with proper compressed air to allow it to work at full capacity.
This is where some thinking about other strategies when considering how to reduce heat load on a cabinet come into play. Namely, passive methods of adding insulation to the exterior of the panel as well as employing heat shields between the heat source and the cabinet. Both methods are good ways to passively reduce the amount of heat load that needs to be delivered from a Cabinet Cooler to the cabinet.
In this application, the customer not only insulated his whole panel, but also the in-coming compressed air line to keep the heat from the turbine from sinking in through the walls of the cabinet and the compressed air pipe. After he made the suggested changes, the customer was able to reduce his cabinet temperature by the needed 10°F to keep a safe, 95°F inside the cabinet.
Lately, we have been receiving calls from customers that are looking for a wet/dry vac that they are accustomed to seeing in the form of an electrical vacuum for their home work shop. They call us wanting a general clean up vacuum for their shop. The items they are looking to clean up are coolant, dust and chips. Our solution for this is to run two vacuums, and most people are asking why can’t it do both. The answer – cost.
Generally, people seeking EXAIR’s pneumatic vacuums already see the value in the durability of a vacuum with no moving parts to maintain or replace when comparing to electric vacuums. It is the simplest of dollar savings, the longer the product lasts and is maintenance free, the more money you will save from the absence of repair parts or new vacuums. And electric vacuums are notorious for burning up motors and not lasting within tough industrial environments. You can read about additional features/benefits within EXAIR’s pneumatic vacuum line here and here, but I will talk about our products specifications in detail.
EXAIR has two categories of vacuum, wet vacs and dry vacs. The original wet vac for vacuuming coolant, swarf, or oil is the Reversible Drum Vac (RDV), used to easily empty and fill coolant sumps quickly. The Chip Trapper features a filtration system which removes chips and debris that is within the coolant, keeping the coolant clean, extending the coolant life and minimizing surfaces for bacteria to grow. The Reversible Drum Vac and the Chip Trapper Systems use 19 SCFM of compressed air at 80 PSIG of and can fill a drum with 55 gallons of water in 90 seconds. These workhorse vacuums will last many years and withstand the rugged treatment found in hardworking manufacturing facilities.
In the other category of our industrial vacuums are the “dry” vacuums. This term “dry” is a little ambiguous, because the vacuums will be able to move some liquid. For instance, the liquid coating a chip or spills on the shop floor can easily be picked up with the dry vacuums. We have a number of dry vacuums available: The Chip Vac is a continuous duty vacuum used for general cleanup around machinery. The Chip Vac drum lid assembly can be used from drum to drum to aid in separating and recycling materials. Our Heavy Duty Dry Vac is best for applications vacuuming heavy materials, abrasive medias or longer distance (20′). And the Heavy Duty HEPA Vac is designed to provide protection from airborne particulate and is suited for dusty environments.
To compare EXAIR products with other pneumatic vacuums, let’s look at the Chip Vac (40 SCFM at 80 PSIG) and the RDV above (19 SCFM at 80 PSIG). Combining the two vacuums you would require (59 SCFM at 80 PSIG. If you search long enough, you could find a pneumatic vacuum that is advertised as wet/dry, but this ability comes at a cost. The most obvious cost is the upfront purchase price, which is consistently much higher than the combined cost of the (2) EXAIR units. Also the units range in air use from 68 SCFM to 110 SCFM. That is up to 86% more air required!
Let’s assume that you did run both constantly. The wet/dry vac will cost you $0.14 extra an hour to run, assuming that your compressed air cost is $0.25 per 1,000 SCF. That is really an unfair comparison to our products though, because we could have (2) vacuums operating at different locations in the plant accomplishing twice as much work. Even still the (2) EXAIR units will save $810 per year with 250 working days in a year and 24 working hours in a day.
$810 per year may not sound like to much to you. What if we change the scenario? How much air can you save? Let’s say you run a large wet/dry vacuum, which consumes 110 SCFM, everyday for 8 hours over 250 working days. The wet/dry vacuum will use 52,800 SCF per day or 13,200,000 SCF per year. This compress air will cost you $3,300 just to compress that air. By comparison, the Chip Vac will only cost you $1,200 per year to run in compressed air. Using the Chip Vac instead of the wet/dry vac, will save you $2,100 per year. in compressed air operating costs.
The video below showcases how to clean the filter elements on the EXAIR Heavy Duty HEPA Vac. This vacuum is ideal for areas where personnel are working and there is fine dust particulate that may be a respiratory hazard. All EXAIR filters are tested 100% in strict accordance to IEST-RP-CC-007 for minimum 99.97% filtration at the 0.3 micron level to meet the HEPA standard.